Every ranking on the public site now has a page explaining exactly what is counted on each network, and it reads the numbers from the code that enforces them.
A site that publishes rankings and never says how it measures is, to a reader, indistinguishable from one that made them up. /methodology is the page that makes the difference checkable: what counts as engagement on each network, where the numbers come from, how often they refresh, and why a page may not exist at all.
The formulas and thresholds on it are not written out by hand. They are read at render time from the same constants and SQL the site actually runs, so the page cannot drift into describing what we used to do. A stale methodology is worse than none. It is a documented claim that is no longer true.